用户登录 手机浏览更多好看哦
手机二维码
英国网友评论美官员曾“咆哮5小时”胁迫英国放弃华为
文章翻译时间:2022-09-18 07:45:24   浏览:
译文背景
英国调查记者Richard Kerbaj在即将出版的新书中揭露,英国放弃与中国华为5G协议并非出自英国本意,而是美国官员逼迫的结果。
据英国情报官员称,美国总统副国家安全顾问波廷杰(Matthew Pottinger)在会谈期间咆哮了长达5个小时之久,并且拒绝听取英国对华为安全的技术分析。据称,波廷杰表示不需要英国去做这些分析,他只需要英国人明白“中国有多么邪恶”。


译文内容
Eric S
Information technology is an important tool for intelligence agencies. For the US, spying on other countries put it at a significant advantage to manipulate and blackmail other politicians and businesses of other countries. In this particular case, the US has been able to control the UK (possibly through blackmail) to make it serves it interest.
信息技术是情报机构的一个重要工具。对美国来说,监视其他国家能让其在操纵和勒索其他国家的政客和企业方面具有重大优势。在这一特殊情况下,美国已经能够控制英国(可能是通过勒索)为自己服务。
 
Bloodhound
I'm British and feel deeply embarrassed at the actions and rhetoric coming from my own government. In particular, I can't understand why the UK wants to inflict humiliation on itself because we all know the world is watching and fully understands the situation.
我是英国人,对我们政府的行动和言论感到非常尴尬。特别是,我不能理解为什么英国想要自取其辱,因为我们都知道全世界都在看着,并且完全理解形势。
 
Lala
I'm always embarrassed and disappointed in my country's government. Smh 
我总是对我们国家政府感到尴尬和失望。哎
 
Praveen shukla
@lala Then you can leave the country 
那么,你可以离开这个国家
 
The Oracle
I can't understand why Truss and Boorish can't have your level of intelligence.
The elected PM system in UK, I can only surmise , is malfunctioning , and producing weird characters unfit to lead the UK , or even to look after its people. 
我不明白为什么特拉斯和鲍里斯没有你这样的智力水平。
我只能猜测,英国选举产生的首相制度出了故障,产生出了不适合领导英国、甚至不适合照顾英国人民的怪胎。
 
Brian Newman
Competition between suppliers drives product advancements. When governments remove competitors from the supply market there is usually a slow down in product improvements. 
供应商之间的竞争推动了产品的进步。当政府把竞争对手从供应市场中驱逐出去时,产品改进通常会放缓。
 
 
cat fish
Shameless US
无耻的美国
 
Nick Bao
Uk should ditch Huawei 5G equipment and focus its efforts to help Ukraine. Slava Ukraine!
英国应该放弃华为的5G设备,集中精力帮助乌克兰!荣耀归于乌克兰!
 
 
Max Kazzora
Are we a lackey to those gringos in the USA or do we have our own foreign policy??? I will leave it for those who strive for neutrality and common sense to decide. 
我们是美国那些美国佬的走狗,还是我们有自己的外交政策???我会把这问题留给那些努力追求中立和常识的人来决定。
 
Jose Urena
The problem is not Huawei, China is developing its own technologies and that is the real problem. 
问题不在华为,中国正在开发自己的技术,这才是真正的问题。
 
 
Shaun
yeah esactly,
US cant stand the competition haha
正是如此,
美国无法忍受竞争,哈哈
 
 
Celia D
There are still many places in the UK where you can’t even get a mobile phone signal 
在英国还有很多地方甚至连手机信号都收不到
 
Yin Hou Khor
I tend to replace the word "allies" with servants.
In addition, the free market is only free when they say so.
我倾向于用仆人来代替“盟友”这个词。
此外,自由市场只有在他们这样说的时候才是自由的。
 
Mac Nicolson
As a European resident I await the day that Europe ditches the US and embraces Russia as part of Europe - unfortunately it would seem that this prospect still terrifies Germany who quite like their dominant position in the Union. 
作为一名欧洲居民,我期待着欧洲抛弃美国、接纳俄罗斯为欧洲一部分的那一天——遗憾的是,这个前景似乎仍让德国感到恐惧,因为德国非常喜欢自己在欧盟的主导地位。
 
Desperatelyseekingrealnews
Not while Germany and the US are in charge
只要德国和美国还在掌权,就不行
 
 
Dried Brainfreeze
Honestly, Im surprised the eu still considers the us an ally 
说实话,我很惊讶欧盟还把美国当成盟友
 
Ashley McIntosh
I think I.ve read after taking out Huawei kit Britain has had to put a lot of it back as no one else can supply similar up to date 5g kit..at a huge cost to the tax payer. 
我想我读过这报道,在取出去华为成套设备之后,英国不得不把很多东西又放回去,因为没有其他国家能够提供类似的最新的5G成套设备... 而纳税人付出了巨大的代价。
 
DailyBeatings
The US is curtailing Huawei while at the same time not offering any alternative to their 5G products. Ericsson and Nokia are European companies, but guess where the majority of their products are produced? Ericsson and Nokia also license essential 5G patents from Huawei. So in the end with Ericsson and Nokia you're still getting Chinese made products using Chinese technology, but paying 30%-50% more for the privilege. Paying more for less, it's the American way... 
美国在遏制华为的同时,也没有提供任何替代华为的5G产品。爱立信和诺基亚都是欧洲公司,但你猜它们的大部分产品是在哪里生产的?爱立信和诺基亚还从华为获得了重要的5G专利许可。所以,最终爱立信和诺基亚仍然可以获得使用中国技术的中国制造的产品,但要为这一优待多付30%-50% 的费用。花更多的钱得到更少的东西,这就是美国人的方式...
猜你喜欢的译文